Author: legalizedchildkidnapping

In the last post entitled, Why the Supreme Court Gave Judges Absolute Judicial Immunity at the Expense of Our “Guaranteed” 14th Amendment Rights in the Constitution one of the reasons the Supreme court decided to give judges absolute judicial immunity because they decided that Judicial immunity was “the settled doctrine of the English courts for… Continue reading Absolute Immunity: Early History in England

In my blog post entitled, Why the Supreme Court Gave Judges Absolute Judicial Immunity at the Expense of Our “Guaranteed” 14th Amendment Rights in the Constitution ,one of the reasons the court gave was because Lord Coke held that a judge handling a murder trial could not be prosecuted in another court for criminal conspiracy.… Continue reading What Lord Coke Had to Say About Judicial Immunity

In the previous article entitled Why the Supreme Court Gave Judges Absolute Judicial Immunity at the Expense of Our “Guaranteed” 14th Amendment Rights in the Constitution, we discussed one of the reasons the Supreme Court justified judicial immunity. The reason was: Lord Coke held in Floyd v Barker that a judge handling a murder trial… Continue reading Floyd and Barker: Did Lord Coke Really Say in That Judges Could Not Be Prosecuted in Another Court?

In my last article entitled, Why the Supreme Court Gave Judges Absolute Judicial Immunity at the Expense of Our “Guaranteed” 14th Amendment Rights in the Constitution one of the reasons the Supreme Court gave judges absolute judicial immunity was the following: Lord Coke held in Floyd and Barker that a judge handling a murder trial… Continue reading When Lord Coke Wanted a Judge Punished…

In my previous article entitled, Why the Supreme Court Gave Judges Absolute Immunity at the Expense of Our “Guaranteed” 14th Amendment Rights in the Constitution one of the reasons the Supreme court decided to give judges absolute judicial immunity because Judicial immunity had “never been denied… in the courts of [the United States].” In this… Continue reading The History of Judicial Immunity in the US

In my blog post entitled, Why the Supreme Court Gave Judges Absolute Judicial Immunity at the Expense of Our “Guaranteed” 14th Amendment Rights in the Constitution one of the reasons the Supreme court gave was because allegedly the definition of “color of law” did not include judges. In today’s article we will find out if… Continue reading Are Judges Included in the Color of Law Definition?

As I went over in the previous points, judicial immunity was not established in England. The historical implications of people having either due process or equal protection rights taken away dates back to the early 1200s and is significant. It started when the Magna Carta was created and it established due process and equal protections… Continue reading England: Historical Consequences of Being Deprived of the Magna Carta

As I went over in the previous points, judicial immunity was not established in the United States. In my research of trying to understand the intent of the framers of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the KKK Act of 1871, I thought it was important to understand the implications of what the framers… Continue reading United States: Consequences of Being Deprived of the Constitution

For the record, there are no immunity clauses to support judicial immunity in the 14th Amendment. However, the Supreme court said, “certain immunities were so well established in 1871, when Section 1983 was enacted, that “we presume that Congress would have specifically so provided had it wished to abolish them.”46 and judicial immunity had “never… Continue reading Immunity Clauses In the Constitution