David Therkelsen: Family Court and Child Endangerment

I’ve spent over $200k.  We proved that my ExW is an alcoholic, tested 97th percentile for personality disorder psychopathology and severely alienated me from my dearest daughter. I am sober, have clean psych testing and am a CPA with all the stereotypes that that implies.  The court gave her primary physical and sole legal custody.  We also proved physical violence committed upon me and my daughter.  I warned them that there would be only one parent in my daughter’s life if my ExW had custody.  I am now pro se.  I appealed the original order and the IN court of appeals stated my brief was “rambling, incoherent and lacked cogent reasoning” despite two attorneys and four other professionals critiquing it.  Both attorneys said it was “very, very good” and “on par with a seasoned attorney”.  The court of appeals also violated my right by failing to address a fraudulent prenup that I had legal argument and statute to prevail.  They, and the IN Supreme Court denied my repeated requests to address and rule on it.

I have not seen my daughter in approximately a yr and a half at this point.  She still accepts my texts because of the continued proceedings but does not reply.

1 comment

  1. I’ve spent over $200k. We proved that my ExW is an alcoholic, tested 97th percentile for personality disorder psychopathology and severely alienated me from my dearest daughter. I am sober, have clean psych testing and am a CPA with all the stereotypes that that implies. The court gave her primary physical and sole legal custody. We also proved physical violence committed upon me and my daughter. I warned them that there would be only one parent in my daughter’s life if my ExW had custody. I am now pro se. I appealed the original order and the IN court of appeals stated my brief was “rambling, incoherent and lacked cogent reasoning” despite two attorneys and four other professionals critiquing it. Both attorneys said it was “very, very good” and “on par with a seasoned attorney”. The court of appeals also violated my right by failing to address a fraudulent prenup that I had legal argument and statute to prevail. They, and the IN Supreme Court denied my repeated requests to address and rule on it.

    I have not seen my daughter in approximately a yr and a half at this point. She still accepts my texts because of the continued proceedings but does not reply.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *